Read EC first for salt: FAO calls below 0.7 dS/m free of restriction and above 3 severe. Read SAR together with EC. RSC above 2.5 me/L marks alkali water under IS 11624. Onion and gram are sensitive, wheat is more tolerant. Leach before sowing, use gypsum only for high RSC.
Updated 2026-11-09
See also: Soil health and the Immunity range.
First check the units
FAO says dS/m and mmho/cm are the same thing. If your report shows µS/cm, divide by 1,000 to get dS/m. RSC in me/L is the same as meq/L.
What each number tells you
Safe and risky ranges
| Test | Safe or good | Caution | High risk | Source |
|---|
| EC (dS/m) | Below 0.7 | 0.7 to 3.0 | Above 3.0 | FAO Paper 29 Rev. 1, Table 1 |
| EC (dS/m) | Below 0.7, good | 0.7 to 3.0, marginally saline | Above 3, saline | IS 11624:2019, Table 1 |
| SAR | Below 10 | No middle class given | Above 10 is a high-SAR class | IS 11624:2019, Table 1 |
| RSC (me/L) | Below 2.5 | 2.5 to 4.0, marginally alkali | Above 4.0, alkali | IS 11624:2019, Table 1 |
| pH | 6.5 to 8.4 is normal | Outside this, look closer | No class given | FAO Paper 29 Rev. 1, Table 1 |
The sources are FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29 Rev. 1 by Ayers and Westcot, and the Bureau of Indian Standards guideline IS 11624:2019, hosted by ICAR-CSSRI Karnal. Limits also differ by region. A CSSRI book on poor quality water records Punjab waters with EC above 4 and RSC above 5 as unsuitable.
FAO says a restriction does not mean the water is unsuitable. It means you must manage more carefully. FAO also assumes good drainage, no water table within 2 metres, and sandy-loam to clay-loam soil. Its limits are too strict for drip.
Read SAR and EC together
At the same SAR, saltier water enters soil more easily. FAO gives these limits for water entry into soil.
| SAR | No problem if EC is above | Severe problem if EC is below |
|---|
| 0 to 3 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 3 to 6 | 1.2 | 0.3 |
| 6 to 12 | 1.9 | 0.5 |
| 12 to 20 | 2.9 | 1.3 |
| 20 to 40 | 5.0 | 2.9 |
So water with SAR 8 and EC 0.4 is in the severe class. The same SAR with EC 2.0 has no restriction on water entry, but that EC still counts as a salt caution.
How your soil and rain change the limit
IS 11624 sets upper EC limits by soil and rainfall. These apply only when RSC is below 2.5 and SAR is below 10. The figures below are for 350 to 550 mm of yearly rain. The limits are lower in drier areas and higher in wetter ones.
| Soil (clay percent) | Sensitive crops | Semi-tolerant | Tolerant |
|---|
| Fine (above 30) | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Moderately fine (20 to 30) | 2.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 |
| Moderately coarse (10 to 20) | 2.5 | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| Coarse (below 10) | 3.0 | 7.5 | 10.0 |
Use the next lower figure if the water table comes within 1.5 metres in kharif, or if the soil has a hard layer.
How sensitive are rabi crops?
| Crop | Water EC for full yield (FAO) | Water EC for 90% yield (FAO) | Salt group in IS 11624 |
|---|
| Wheat | 4.0 | 4.9 | Medium tolerant |
| Potato | 1.1 | 1.7 | Not listed |
| Onion | 0.8 | 1.2 | Highly sensitive |
| Gram (chickpea) | Not given | Not given | Highly sensitive |
| Cumin | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
The EC figures come from FAO Table 4 and assume 15 to 20 percent of the water drains below the roots. They are a guide, not a promise of yield. FAO rates chickpea and potato moderately sensitive. FAO also warns that wheat is less tolerant at germination, and upper soil ECe should stay below 4 to 5 dS/m then.
For sodium, wheat is far more tolerant than gram or onion. IS 11624 Table 8 puts wheat at ESP 30 to 50, chickpea at 16 to 20 and onion at 20 to 25. ESP means exchangeable sodium percentage, a soil test.
Evidence on cumin is thin. In a pot study at CAZRI, Jodhpur, water of EC 10 cut seed yield in all five genotypes, by about 24% in the best and over 50% in the worst. In a study in Iran, the authors called EC 5 the upper limit for an economic crop. Varieties differ, so ask your KVK or state agricultural university.
In Gujarat, the main problem may be salt, not RSC. A Junagadh Agricultural University survey of 180 wells in Gir Somnath found EC from 1.15 to 12.39 dS/m, yet 92.2% of samples were safe for RSC. That is one district, so your well may differ.
What you can do this season
Gypsum is for high RSC and sodium. It does not take salt out of water. FAO says it is especially effective when water EC is below 0.5 and much less effective in very salty water.
FAO's figure is that 1 me/L of calcium needs 86 kg of pure gypsum per 1,000 cubic metres of water. That is 10 cm of water on one hectare. As an example, to bring RSC 6 down to 2.5, the sum is 3.5 x 86, or about 301 kg of pure gypsum. At 70% purity it is about 430 kg. Ask your lab or KVK to confirm your target.
Gypsum can go in a bed, or as clods in the water channel. A model chamber design on TNAU Agritech uses 25 to 50 mm lumps and is refilled after 40 to 50 hours of running. One review says wheat after rice usually responds when RSC is above 5, but on light soils with fallow kharif it may not respond below 10. Do not add sulphur to irrigation water: FAO calls it not satisfactory for water application. Gypsum supply and subsidy differ by state and change over time, so check with your state agriculture department.
Taking the sample
A guide on Punjab's agriculture website says to run the tube well for half an hour, and TNAU's KVK advice says 10 to 15 minutes for bore wells. Rinse a clean bottle with the same water, fill it, and write your name, village, well depth, crop and soil type. See also our soil health page.
We have worked with farmers since 2006 and make biostimulants at our own plant at GIDC Shihor, Bhavnagar. No biostimulant, ours included, takes salt out of water. Fix the water plan first.
Send us a photo of your water report with your soil type, crop and any second water source. We will help you read it. Our number is +91 99787 91167 (call or WhatsApp).
Sources
- FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29 Rev. 1, Water quality for agriculture, Chapter 1 (Ayers and Westcot)
- FAO Paper 29 Rev. 1, Chapter 2, salinity management and crop tolerance
- FAO Paper 29 Rev. 1, Chapter 3, infiltration problems and gypsum
- FAO, Annex 1: Crop salt tolerance data
- IS 11624:2019, Quality of irrigation water: guidelines (Bureau of Indian Standards, hosted by ICAR-CSSRI)
- Minhas, Qadir and Yadav (2019), Groundwater irrigation induced soil sodification and response options, Agricultural Water Management
- Yadav et al. (eds.) (2010), Use of poor quality water in agriculture, CSSRI Karnal
- Polara and Chauhan, Evaluation of quality of irrigation water in coastal Gir Somnath district, Junagadh Agricultural University
- Garg, Burman and Kathju (2003), Genotypic differences in cumin under salt stress, Journal of Spices and Aromatic Crops
- Hassanzadehdelouei, Vazin and Nadaf (2013), Effect of salt stress on cumin, Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova
- TNAU Agritech, Reclaiming sodic water for irrigation through gypsum chamber
- Punjab Department of Agriculture site, Collection of water samples
- TNAU Agritech, Frequently asked questions in Krishi Vigyan Kendras
By Gafar Laiya, founder of Gujarat Bio Organics, working with farmers since 2006. Results differ from farm to farm with soil, weather, crop and management. Farmer experiences on this site are their own reports, not a promise of results.